Cannot remember if the following case has ever been discussed. And laggard that I am, i have only just coem across it. I'm not sure what I make of it and I wonder what people who have come across and read it made of the analysis of the putative sub-tort of "business defamation"? see onwards from para [37].

What does it do to defamation generally? What does it do to malicious falsehood?

best wishes,

John Murphy